Conflict is a ubiquitous element of human interaction, and its presence within organizations is both inevitable and unavoidable. While conflicts are commonly perceived as detrimental, they also result in positive outcomes when handled well. In this series of posts, I’ll cover some useful frameworks and tools for strategically managing conflict and fostering constructive resolution, but first lets explore the multifaceted nature of conflict within the organizational context in order to shed some light on its advantages and disadvantages.
Destructive Ongoing Conflict
On the downside, conflict can have detrimental effects on relationships and team dynamics. Strained interpersonal relationships and eroded trust can create a toxic work environment. Collaboration and cooperation among team members may be compromised, hindering productivity and stifling innovation. Conflict can act as a distraction, diverting individuals’ focus from their core tasks and responsibilities, impeding productivity and engagement.Conflict can also negatively impact employee well-being, with increased stress and emotional strain leading to burnout and affecting individual performance and job satisfaction.
Furthermore, unresolved conflict has the potential to escalate and cause significant long-term damage. In extreme cases, conflict that becomes public or affects external stakeholders can damage an organization’s reputation and brand image. Moreover, conflicts consume valuable resources and attention, diverting them from strategic initiatives.
Constructively Resolved Conflict
On the upside, conflict can be a catalyst for creativity and innovation. It serves as a breeding ground for divergent thinking, challenging the status quo and fostering an environment where new ideas and perspectives flourish. Dynamic discussions and alternative solutions emerge from conflict, igniting creativity and driving organizational progress. It also has the potential to enhance decision-making and problem-solving. Constructive debate and discourse encourage critical thinking, uncover biases, broaden perspectives, and enable organizations to consider a wider range of solutions.
Conflict also plays a pivotal role in personal and professional growth. By engaging in conflicts, individuals are encouraged to engage in self-reflection, gaining a better understanding of their own values and needs. This helps foster emotional intelligence, empathy, and active listening as individuals seek resolution and aim for sustainable outcomes. Practice in conflict resolution skills empowers people to navigate more complex situations effectively over time.
Shifting from Destructive to Constructive
To manage conflicts effectively and maximize positive outcomes, organizations must adopt proactive approaches. Clear policies and procedures for conflict resolution provide guidance and ensure fairness, and encouraging a culture of open and inclusive communication allows conflicting parties to voice their concerns and find common ground. Building conflict resolution skills among employees is essential, though. Promoting self-awareness and emotional intelligence empowers individuals to approach conflicts with empathy and understanding, and training programs and resources can equip them with techniques to navigate challenging situations and enhance their ability to manage conflicts constructively.
So what kind of training do you provide? Which frameworks do you use? Over the next 8 articles, we’ll take a deeper dive into some of the more popular tools and frameworks that assist in collaborative conflict resolution:
- The Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument (TKI) assessment tool to understand individual conflict management styles.
- The SCARF (Status, Certainty, Autonomy, Relatedness, and Fairness) model to understand how individuals perceive and respond to social stimuli.
- The Ladder of Inference model to understand how individuals perceive their world, make decisions, and take action.
- The Circle of Conflict framework to categorize and diagnose the cause of conflict.
- The Principled Negotiation or Interest-Based Relational Approach (IBR) framework that views conflict through the lens of integrative bargaining and prioritizes relationship management.
- The ZOPA (Zone of Possible Agreement), BATNA (Best Alternative To A Negotiated Agreement) and WATNA (Worst Alternative To A Negotiated Agreement) framing that helps us understand and widen the possibility of acceptable outcomes.
- The Crucial Conversations model, which focuses on high-stakes, emotional conflict.
- The Transformative Mediation model, which focuses on using a third party to change interpersonal dynamics.
You can employ one or more of these to help shift your conflict resolution skills away from zero-sum thinking to collaborative problem solving where all parties get something they want.
Oceanwave Coaching 